Pissed Consumer - Just plain double talk from this company

Home » Consumer Reviews » Kia Motors America, Inc. » Just plain double talk from this company

Comments

Just plain double talk from this company

Jul 21, 2008

Kia Motors complaint by Bellyupinmi

I have a 2002 KIA Sedona with 54,000 miles on it, bought it new so I am the only owner of this piece of crap. All scheduled maint. has been done by authorized KIA dealers. I took it in for its 60,000 mile maint. checkup and was told that the timing belt needed to be replaced. After looking in the Warranty book I found that this is considered a part of the 100,000 mile power train warranty so I approved the work, thinking that it was covered under warranty as stated on page 4 in the booklet under Power train coverage. To my surprise when I went to pick it up after 2 days, I was hit with a $600 timing belt charge with labor. After a long discussion with the service manager with no results, I called KIA Customer service in California. I was told that the timing belt was not covered because it was worn and since it is rubber it gets worn out, however if the new belt broke, they may cover that. I read this dummy who could hardly speak english word for word from the booklet that says the timing belt is included in the 120 month/100,000 mile warranty. She then asked me if I felt that they should be required to replace the tires too if they were worn out. I told her this was a completely different situation, their service techs said the belt was bad and needed to be replaced, and this is a warranty part and she again said that this belt wearing out is considered normal wear and tear, so it is not covered. I told her every part on the vehicle has wear and tear so what was her point in that statement. She told me that rubber wears so it is not covered and the dealership was well within its rights to charge me for replacement. I asked her what kind of warranty plan do you people have? She then said if the belt had actually broke it may be covered under certain circumstances. I told her that was the dumbest thing I have ever heard to allow a belt that the dealership said was about to break before they might consider it under certain circumstances, I asked her what circumstances, and she said it is on a case per case basis. If I would have said do not replace it and it broke, they would then tell me that we were advised to replace it and since we didn't it was our fault. Talk about a bunch of double talk. Why put this part in the warranty booklet if it it is not covered? I told her when my headlight went out on my Explorer, Ford picked up the tab 100% with labor and that went out because of normal wear and tear, but she again went off on how rubber wears and so they could not cover that. I will never buy another KIA ever.

More Kia Motors Reviews

ads from Shopzilla

Discuss
Kia Motors News

on our forums

Quote this article on your site | Views: 174

Comments (1)

1. Written by retailer4life, on 21-07-2008 22:11

I, too, have many friends who own both Japanese and Korean autos (Toyota, Honda, Hyundai) and regardless of what all of the advertising would lead you to believe, all of these late model autos have had considerably more down time for small and not-so-small service issues as compared to my domestic GM products over the years. I traded in a 1997 Buick LeSabre with 86,000 mi. that NEVER used a drop of oil, never left me stranded anywhere. Only thing I ever did during the entire life of the vehicle was change the oil every 3000 mi., and change the air filter and set of new tires @ 60000 mi. Other than that, nothing. I now drive a 2006 Impala that just turned 30000 mi, and same good luck. The domestics, GM, Ford, Chrysler all get a bum rap in my book, they're (we're) the BEST!!

Report

Comments on Just plain double talk from this company
Consumer Forum is another great place to discuss consumer concerns NOT RELATED to this article.
Name:
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments